Applied AI systems · St Andrews, Scotland

Make the AI system dependable, not just impressive.

I’m Dipankar Sarkar. I help teams move ambitious AI from research or prototype into systems people can operate: governed agents, durable workflows, exact evaluation, local inference, and cloud-to-edge execution.

Founder, Neul Labs Fractional AI CTO Remote-first from Scotland
Dipankar Sarkar

Current question

How much authority can an AI system hold while people remain meaningfully in control?

years building production systems
18+
user scale for ML systems at Hike
100M+
seeded kernel defects caught in a measured corpus
10/10
companies founded across 2008–2024
6
The work

Four outcomes worth engineering for

The technology changes quickly. The operational obligations do not: authority, correctness, recovery, and ownership must be designed into the system.

Selected work

Systems and papers you can inspect

Runtime governance, durable agent state, and exact evaluation for generated GPU code—implemented, measured, and documented in public.

Public reference systems + delivery experience 01

Governed agents

High-impact agent actions remain permissioned, reviewable, interruptible, and explainable.

Books & playbooks

Teach the system clearly enough that someone else can operate it

Two Packt books span web infrastructure and everyday AI workflows. What Generative AI extends the teaching into open GenAI and Agentic AI playbooks for business and technical leaders.

Where this is useful

Technical depth, translated into an operating outcome.

I work across the line from research and architecture to code, evaluation, production controls, and the team that will own the system afterward.

Financial services and regulated AI
Robotics, warehousing, and manufacturing
Cloud platforms and developer tooling
Consumer machine learning at scale
Blockchain infrastructure and protocol security
Startups, venture building, and technical diligence

A useful first conversation

Start with the outcome that has to change.

Tell me what people need to be able to do, what currently fails, and what evidence would justify the next investment. We can work backward from there.